That left an opportunity for products like Adobe Type Manager to furnish scalable PostScript fonts for desktop publishing in Windows. In 1990, Windows 3.0 had brought plenty of improvements to Windows, but a particular weak spot was its reliance on bitmap fonts that couldn’t scale smoothly. Easier Desktop Publishing with TrueType Fonts Let’s take a look at some of those new (or improved) features and tools below. “A ton of bugs were fixed, and 3.1 was much more stable and had better tools.” “3.1 was the green light for major adoption by end users and companies,” says Silverberg. By fixing major bugs in 3.0 and adding attractive new features, previously nervous OEMs and individual customers came aboard. With 3.1, Microsoft built on momentum gained with each previous Windows release. “OEMs would have much preferred to just ship DOS and have Windows purchased and installed by the PC buyers.” “We needed to create overwhelming demand by PC buyers-both end users and IT-to have Win 3.1 preinstalled,” he says. PCs such as the Tandy Sensation (1993) shipped with Windows 3.1 included. With Windows 3.1, the firm took another step and pushed extra hard to have Windows ship on new OEM PCs instead of relying on users to purchase and install Windows after the fact. Since the public announcement of Windows almost a decade prior, Microsoft had worked aggressively to gain industry support behind its GUI-based operating environment. And that was enough, because Windows 3.1 made Windows more popular than ever before. But for now, Windows 3.1’s improvements in text rendering and multimedia-and the increased availability of Windows applications from the industry-made trips to the DOS command line less necessary. As with previous versions of Windows, it still ran on top of MS-DOS (the big transition away from the command line would come with Windows 95 a few years later). Two years after Windows 3.0, Microsoft shipped Windows 3.1.
0 kommentar(er)
